County-Level Population Data for Utah

Get this map as a JPG image or a PNG image.

The table is sorted in ascending order by FIPS code. Click a column title to sort by that column; click again to reverse the sort.

FIPS1	County name	RUC code2	Pop. 1990	Pop. 2000	Pop. 2010	Change 1990-2000	Change 2000-10
49001	Beaver County	9	4,765	5,997	6,629	26.0%	10.5%
49003	Box Elder County	4	36,485	42,755	49,975	17.2%	16.9%
49005	Cache County	3	70,183	91,389	112,656	30.2%	23.3%
49007	Carbon County	7	20,228	20,531	21,403	1.0%	4.2%
49009	Daggett County	8	690	918	1,059	33.5%	15.4%
49011	Davis County	2	187,941	238,997	306,479	27.2%	28.2%
49013	Duchesne County	6	12,645	14,432	18,607	13.7%	28.9%
49015	Emery County	9	10,332	10,859	10,976	6.1%	1.1%
49017	Garfield County	9	3,980	4,733	5,172	19.0%	9.3%
49019	Grand County	7	6,620	8,407	9,225	26.6%	9.7%
49021	Iron County	4	20,789	33,793	46,163	62.5%	36.6%
49023	Juab County	2	5,817	8,236	10,246	41.6%	24.4%
49025	Kane County	6	5,169	6,056	7,125	17.0%	17.7%
49027	Millard County	7	11,333	12,405	12,503	9.5%	0.8%
49029	Morgan County	2	5,528	7,132	9,469	29.0%	32.8%
49031	Piute County	9	1,277	1,437	1,556	12.4%	8.3%
49033	Rich County	8	1,725	1,961	2,264	13.7%	15.5%
49035	Salt Lake County	2	725,956	898,429	1,029,655	23.8%	14.6%
49037	San Juan County	7	12,621	14,389	14,746	14.2%	2.5%
49039	Sanpete County	6	16,259	22,722	27,822	40.0%	22.4%
49041	Sevier County	7	15,431	18,840	20,802	22.1%	10.4%
49043	Summit County	2	15,518	29,746	36,324	91.6%	22.1%
49045	Tooele County	2	26,601	40,740	58,218	53.1%	42.9%
49047	Uintah County	7	22,211	25,174	32,588	13.6%	29.5%
49049	Utah County	2	263,590	368,539	516,564	39.8%	40.2%
49051	Wasatch County	6	10,089	15,206	23,530	50.8%	54.7%
49053	Washington County	3	48,560	90,325	138,115	86.1%	52.9%
49055	Wayne County	9	2,177	2,509	2,778	15.3%	10.7%
49057	Weber County	2	158,330	196,526	231,236	24.1%	17.7%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1990 and 2000 Censuses of Population (corrected), and 2010 county redistricting files.

1) The FIPS codes uniquely identify each county and are part of the Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce. For more information, see the NIST FIPS publication page.

2) The 2003 rural-urban continuum codes classify metropolitan counties (codes 1 through 3) by size of the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), and nonmetropolitan counties (codes 4 through 9) by degree of urbanization and proximity to metro areas. See rural-urban continuum codes for precise definitions of each code.

Download the State- and county-level data in Excel format.