County-Level Population Data for Nevada

Get this map as a JPG image or a PNG image.

The table is sorted in ascending order by FIPS code. Click a column title to sort by that column; click again to reverse the sort.

FIPS1	County name	RUC code2	Pop. 1990	Pop. 2000	Pop. 2010	Change 1990-2000	Change 2000-10
32001	Churchill County	6	17,938	23,984	24,877	33.7%	3.7%
32003	Clark County	1	741,368	1,375,741	1,951,269	85.6%	41.8%
32005	Douglas County	4	27,637	41,245	46,997	49.3%	13.9%
32007	Elko County	5	33,463	45,287	48,818	35.3%	7.8%
32009	Esmeralda County	9	1,344	971	783	-27.8%	-19.4%
32011	Eureka County	9	1,547	1,651	1,987	6.7%	20.4%
32013	Humboldt County	7	12,844	16,081	16,528	25.4%	2.8%
32015	Lander County	7	6,266	5,790	5,775	-7.5%	-0.3%
32017	Lincoln County	8	3,775	4,165	5,345	10.3%	28.3%
32019	Lyon County	6	20,001	34,503	51,980	72.5%	50.7%
32021	Mineral County	7	6,475	5,070	4,772	-21.7%	-5.9%
32023	Nye County	6	17,781	32,522	43,946	82.8%	35.1%
32027	Pershing County	8	4,336	6,711	6,753	54.4%	0.6%
32029	Storey County	2	2,526	3,408	4,010	34.6%	17.7%
32031	Washoe County	2	254,667	339,473	421,407	33.3%	24.1%
32033	White Pine County	7	9,264	9,171	10,030	-0.9%	9.4%
32510	Carson City	3	40,443	52,477	55,274	29.7%	5.3%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1990 and 2000 Censuses of Population (corrected), and 2010 county redistricting files.

1) The FIPS codes uniquely identify each county and are part of the Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce. For more information, see the NIST FIPS publication page.

2) The 2003 rural-urban continuum codes classify metropolitan counties (codes 1 through 3) by size of the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), and nonmetropolitan counties (codes 4 through 9) by degree of urbanization and proximity to metro areas. See rural-urban continuum codes for precise definitions of each code.

Download the State- and county-level data in Excel format.