USDA Rice Projections, 2007-16
The global rice market remains critical to the viability of the U.S. rice
industry. Despite steady expansion in domestic rice use, exports continue to
account for 45 percent or more of total use of U.S. rice each year. Although
accounting for less than 2 percent of global rice production, the United States
is the fourth-largest rice exporting country. The United States faces stiff
competition in the global market for milled rice from lower cost Asian exporters
and has lost substantial market share over the past decade, primarily in Sub-Saharan
Africa and parts of the Middle East. However, rapid expansion in U.S. rough
rice exports—mostly to Latin America—has offset much of the decline
in market share in the global milled rice market.
While annual rates of growth for domestic disappearance continue to expand,
they have declined from levels achieved in the 1980s and 1990s. The slowdown
in domestic growth was largely due to the popularity of protein-oriented diets
among some consumers early in the 21st Century, and a shift to a Western diet
by second- and third-generation Asian immigrants.
Each year, USDA updates its 10-year projection of supply and utilization for
major field crops grown in the United States and major producing countries
and regions, including rice (see Overview
of the USDA Baseline Process for more information). The commodity
projections are used to forecast farm program costs and to prepare the President's
budget. One key use of the projections is as a reference from which to analyze
underlying policy changes affecting U.S. agriculture. This discussion summarizes
the analysis underlying the rice projections for 2007/08-2016/17. Details about
the projections for the U.S. macroeconomy, other U.S. crops, U.S. livestock,
the U.S. agricultural sector, and global agricultural trade can be found in
the Agricultural Baseline Projections briefing room.
The 2006/07 U.S. rice market is facing tighter supplies, higher prices, and
smaller exports than a year earlier. U.S. rough rice prices in 2006/07 are
the highest since at least 1997/98, a result of tighter U.S. supplies and higher
global rice prices. U.S. prices are also being supported by higher prices for
other grains and oilseeds, as well as by high input prices, especially for fuel
and fertilizer. In the global market, prices are being supported by a tightening
supply situation, the effects of Thailand's rough rice intervention purchases,
and a strong Baht. As of late November 2006, quoted prices for Thailand's
100-percent grade B milled rice for export were up almost 10 percent from a
year earlier. This is the fifth consecutive year of rising global prices. The
5-year global bull market is largely due to declining global stocks.
Projections for U.S. Rice Supply and Use
Highlighted below are the key assumptions regarding factors driving annual levels
of production, trade, disappearance, and prices for rice in the United States
for 2007/08-2016/17. Projection details can be obtained from the U.S.
rice supply and use table.
Supply
Several factors underlie the long-term trends in both plantings and yield
growth that will determine the size of the U.S. rice crop during 2007/08-2016/17.
Rice plantings are limited by high fuel and fertilizer prices and
strong returns for alternative crops. Despite rising prices for
U.S. rough rice over most of the projection period, annual rice plantings
are expected to remain 200,000-300,000 acres below the 2005/06 level over
the next 10 years. High prices for competing crops—primarily soybeans
and feed grains—plus high costs for fuel and fertilizer will keep several
hundred thousand acres of former rice land out of rice production in the
Delta. In addition, continued contraction of rice plantings on the Gulf Coast
are likely, as this region has the highest per unit cost of production. Rice
acreage on the Texas Gulf Coast has dropped sharply since the early 1980s,
and is currently less than half the level planted a decade ago.
Prior to the March 2007 Clearfield 131 development (see Trace
Elements of Genetically Engineered Elements Found in U.S. Long-Grain Supplies),
this analysis projected U.S. rice plantings to increase in 2007/08—with
a major rebound in California acreage accounting for much of the expansion.
A cold wet spring sharply limited California plantings in both 2005/06 and
2006/07. U.S. rice plantings are projected to decline in 2008/09—a
result of higher returns to competing crops, primarily corn and soybeans—and
then slowly increase over the remainder of the projection period as rice
prices and net returns increase and pull acreage back into rice. By 2016/17,
U.S. rice plantings are projected to reach nearly 3.1 million acres, virtually
unchanged from 2007/08, but well below the 3.53 million planted in 1999/2000.
In past years, much higher yields achieved for rice typically offset rising
corn and soybean prices, limiting any contraction in rice acreage when corn
and soybean prices rose. However, much higher fuel and fertilizer prices since
2005 have made rice noncompetitive with soybeans and corn in some areas of
the Delta. In contrast to the South, California rice acreage is projected to
remain around its 2007/08 near-record level for the remainder of the projections.
There is little substitution among crops in the California rice growing area.
Demand for California rice is expected to remain strong in both domestic and
global markets over the next 10 years.
Trace Elements of Genetically Engineered Elements Found in U.S. Long-Grain Supplies
This analysis, completed in December 2006, did not consider the impact on
plantings of the March 5, 2007, USDA announcement banning further commercial
sale and the planting of the long-grain variety Clearfield 131, due
to discovery of trace elements of a regulated genetically engineered (GE)
material in this new, popular high-yielding variety. This ban came less than
7 months after USDA announced, on August 18, 2006, that trace amounts of
GE material had been found in Cheniere, another popular, high-yielding
long-grain variety. In November 2006, the USA Rice Federation announced an
action plan that prohibited the commercial planting of Cheniere in
2007. Together, these two varieties accounted for about 30 percent of southern
rice acreage in 2006. The loss of these two popular long-grain varieties,
as well as increased uncertainty regarding the acceptability of U.S. rice
in some global markets due to GE issues, will likely reduce the competitiveness
of rice compared with other planting options in the near-term.
|
Rice yields are projected to reach record highs. Average
U.S. rice yields are projected to increase each year of the projections,
surpassing the 2004/05 record by 2008/09. Yields are projected to increase
1 percent per year through 2010/11, as the South continues to adopt new,
higher-yielding long-grain varieties. U.S. yield growth is projected to slowly
taper off after 2010/11, when adoption is nearly complete in the South. Yield
growth projections in the latter part of the period are primarily due to
better management practices in all U.S. rice growing regions.
U.S. rice farmers achieved record yields each year from 2000 to 2004, primarily
due to the adoption of new, higher yielding long-grain varieties in the South.
Weather problems in both California and the South—including two severe
Gulf Coast hurricanes—reduced yields in 2005. Yields recovered somewhat
in both regions in 2006, although a second, consecutive cold wet spring limited
the California yield recovery. Over the past decade, yield growth has been
slower in California than in the South, a result of several weather problems,
a lack of new varieties, and environmental regulations—such as the
phase-down of straw burning.
Higher yields are projected to boost annual production. Except
for 2008/09, U.S. rice production is projected to increase each year of the
projections, mostly due to higher yields. A higher yield and a small area
expansion are expected to boost U.S. production in 2007/08. Higher
returns for competing crops are projected to pull rice area and production
down in 2008/09. Both rice area and production are projected to increase
for the remainder of the period, with increasing yields accounting for most
of rising production. By 2016/17, U.S. rice production is projected at 230.5
million hundredweight (cwt), 19 percent larger than the 2006/07 crop, but
still 1 percent below the 2004/05 record.
Imports are projected to account for a growing share of domestic
use. Since 1980/81, U.S. rice imports have increased almost every
year and have accounted for an increasing share of domestic use. Currently,
imports account for almost 15 percent of total domestic use, including
the residual or unreported losses in marketing, processing, and transporting,
as well as any statistical errors. Imports are projected to increase 3
percent a year over the next decade, nearly three times the pace of the projected
expansion in domestic disappearance. By 2016/17, imports are projected
at a record 24.1 million cwt, accounting for almost 18 percent of domestic
disappearance.
The bulk of U.S. rice imports are aromatic or fragrant rices—primarily
jasmine from Thailand and smaller amounts of basmati rice from India and
Pakistan. Classified as long-grains, these particular high-quality Asian
aromatic varieties have not been successfully grown in the United States.
While these varieties were once sold mostly in Asian neighborhoods and in
major coastal cities, they are now available in most urban areas and in ethnic
restaurants across much of the country. U.S. plant breeders are trying to
develop U.S. varieties to compete with these high-quality aromatic imports.
In addition to the aromatic varieties, since 2001/02, the United States
has imported significant quantities of medium- and short-grain rice, mostly
from China. Puerto Rico—the largest U.S. territory—accounts for
virtually all of these purchases. Australia supplied most of this rice in
2001/02, but tight supplies took it out of this market in 2002/03. China,
and to a lesser extent Egypt, have supplied this rice since 2003/04. Tight
U.S. supplies of medium- and short-grain rice (grown mostly in California)
and lower landed prices from competitors are behind the imports of medium-grain
rice by Puerto Rico. U.S. imports of medium/short-grain rice are expected
to remain at the 2006/07 record level for the remainder of the projections.
Demand
Several factors will determine the long-term demand for U.S. rice
in domestic and international markets, including U.S. population growth,
the level of U.S. immigration, the ethnic makeup of the U.S. population,
and the size and composition of global rice trade.
U.S. exports are projected to show modest
expansion. U.S. rice exports are projected to decline in
2006/07, a result of a much wider price difference over Asian competitors
and tighter supplies. Exports hold nearly steady from 2008/09-2010/11
and then increase each year after 2010/11, reaching the 2005/06 level
of 115.8 million cwt by 2015/06. Despite the projected expansion
after 2010/11, U.S. exports remain below the 2002/03 record of 124.6
million cwt throughout the period. The U.S. export expansion is the
result of a declining price difference vis-a-vis Asian competitors,
expanding global trade, and increasing U.S. supplies.
While typically the world's largest rice exporting country from
the late 1960s to 1980, the United States has faced increasing competition
from lower cost Asian competitors since the early 1980s. First, Thailand
in the 1980s, and then Vietnam in the 1990s, surpassed the United States
as a rice exporter, making the United States the third-largest exporter
by 1996. In 2001, India overtook the United States as a rice exporter,
making the United States the current fourth-largest exporter of rice.
The U.S. share of the global export market declined from 24 percent
in the early 1980s to less than 11 percent by 2000. Since 2004, smaller
shipments from China have allowed the U.S. share of global rice trade
to increase to about 12 percent. Despite higher production costs and
substantial competition, the United States remains a major rice exporter.
High quality, the reliability of the United States as a supplier, year
round delivery, and versatility of products offered—including
rough or unmilled rice—account for much of the United States' resilience
in the global export market. High freight costs from Asian exporters
to many non-Asian buyers, especially in the Western Hemisphere, also help
maintain U.S. export levels.
Rough rice is expected to account for a growing share of U.S. rice exports. While the United States has lost substantial market
share in the international market for milled rice, which accounts
for the bulk of global rice trade, it has tripled its rough exports
over the past decade. Rough rice exports are expected to account
for 36 percent of U.S. rice exports in 2006/07, the highest share
on record. The volume of U.S. rough rice exports reached a record
42.8 million cwt in 2002/03, with Brazil purchasing more than 7 million
cwt. Rough exports are expected to continue expanding over the next
10 years and to account for a growing share of U.S. exports.
Mexico and Central America account for the bulk of U.S. rough rice
exports, mostly southern long grain. South America, primarily Brazil,
sometimes imports substantial amounts of U.S. rough rice when regional
supplies are inadequate. The United States accounts for nearly all
the rice imported by Mexico and Central America, and is the dominant
supplier of rice to Latin America from outside the region.
Several factors account for the large U.S. market share in Latin America.
First, the United States is the only major rice exporter that allows
rough rice to be exported. The other top exporters—Thailand,
Vietnam, India, Pakistan, and China—prohibit rough rice exports,
preferring to keep the value added from milling internal. Second, both
Mexico and Central America prefer to import rough rice instead of milled
rice. This allows their mills to operate at full capacity (achieving
the lowest per unit production cost) and prevents competition with
domestically milled rice. Also, in addition to a location advantage
over Asian shippers, the United States has trade agreements—such
as the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Dominican Republic-Central
American Free Trade Agreement—that assist U.S. exporters in this
region.
For the past decade, the United States has also shipped rough rice
to Turkey—a medium/short-grain market—but often faces competition
from Australia and Egypt. Since the start of 2004/05, import restrictions
have sharply reduced U.S. shipments to Turkey. The United States has
protested these import restrictions to the World Trade Organization,
which is currently examining this issue. The large share of U.S. rice
exports going to Latin America—where the United States faces
little competition from Asian suppliers—has partially insulated
U.S. export levels from price changes.
The U.S. is expected to
lose market share in the global milled rice market. The
United States has lost substantial market share in the global market
for milled rice over the past two decades. First Thailand, and more
recently India, have substantially cut the U.S. market share in South
Africa and Saudi Arabia, primarily due to lower prices and improved
quality—especially for parboiled rice. The re-emergence in
2004/05 of Iraq as a major buyer of U.S. long-grain milled rice has
halted the long-term U.S. export decline in the Middle East, with
Iraq currently one of the largest buyers of U.S. rice. The United
States is not price-competitive among the huge Southeast Asian rice
importers—primarily Indonesia, the Philippines, and Malaysia.
Thailand and Vietnam supply the bulk of Southeast Asia's rice
imports.
In 2006/07, the United States lost the bulk of its market in the European
Union (EU)—a high-quality long-grain market—due to costly
testing requirements mandated by the EU, a result of the discovery
of trace amounts of genetically engineered (GE) rice in supplies of
U.S. long-grain rice. The EU typically accounted for 10 percent of
U.S. long-grain exports. The EU purchased mostly brown rice—rice
with the hull removed but the bran layer remaining—from the United
States. The 2007 projections assume, at best, a slow recovery of some
U.S. shipments to the EU. To date, Thailand has replaced most U.S.
sales to the EU. India and Pakistan have recently increased shipments
to the EU as well.
Only in Northeast Asia—Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan—has
the United States maintained its market share in the global milled
rice market. Northeast Asia imports almost exclusively medium/short-grain
rice, which accounts for 10-12 percent of global rice trade. Rice imports
by these three Northeast Asian countries are all the result of World
Trade Organization (WTO) agreements. None of the three countries is
projected to import beyond its WTO commitments.
The United States supplies almost half of Japan's WTO rice
imports and has been a regular supplier to South Korea and Taiwan as
well. The strength of the United States in the Northeast Asian medium/short-grain
markets has offset some of the U.S. decline in the long-grain global
milled rice markets. These projections assume the United States will
maintain its current market share in the high-quality Northeast Asian
market. South Korea, which agreed in 2005 to double its WTO imports
by 2014, accounts for the only growth in the Northeast Asian
market. Japan and Taiwan's imports are assumed to remain at current
levels for the remainder of the decade.
Domestic disappearance is expected to continue to increase. Total
domestic use is projected to climb each year of the period, reaching
record levels annually. Stronger domestic use is primarily due to a
rising population; increases in per capita disappearance are projected
to be quite small. The 2007 projections assume domestic disappearance
will expand about 1 percent each year, slightly ahead of population
growth. This rate of expansion is well below the 5 percent achieved
in the 1980s and the 3-4 percent rates in the 1990s. The slowdown was
likely due to a shift to western diets away from a rice-based diet
by second- and third-generation Asian immigrants.
While the United States has seen its share of the global rice market
decline since the early 1980s, the domestic market has expanded virtually
every year, outpacing population growth and leading to higher per capita
use. In 1980, total domestic disappearance accounted for just 41 percent
of total use. Exports accounted for the remainder. In 2006/07, domestic
disappearance is projected to account for almost 55 percent of total
use. A big increase in the Asian-American and Hispanic-American populations,
introduction of new rice-based food products,
and marketing efforts by the rice industry have accounted for much
of this long-term growth.
Little build-up in stocks is projected over the decade. U.S. ending
stocks are projected to slowly decline from this year's level
through 2010/11, and then to slowly increase back to almost 31.0 million
cwt by 2016/17. Despite the slight stocks buildup in the second-half
of the period, stocks are projected to remain well below the 2005/06
level of 43.0 million cwt. The stocks-to-use ratio projection declines
from 15.7 percent in 2006/07 to 11.8 percent in 2010/11, and then levels
off at 12.1 percent for the remainder of the decade. From 1996/97 to
2005/06, the stocks-to-use ratio averaged 14.2 percent.
Global prices are projected to increase. Global rice prices are projected
to increase about 2 percent every year, a result of increasing global
rice trade and some shift to higher quality rice from lower quality
imports by low-income buyers. The adjusted world price, a weekly announced
rough-rice price calculated by USDA that is used to determine marketing
loan benefits, is projected to increase from $7.00 per cwt in 2006/07
to $8.63 by 2016/17. The adjusted world price is projected to remain
above the U.S. average rough-rice loan rate of $6.50 per cwt throughout
the period. At these calculated price levels, no marketing loan payments
would be made to U.S. rice producers.
U.S. season-average farm price to increase
after 2008/09. Rising global trading prices and growing
domestic demand are projected to push the U.S. season-average farm
price higher each year after 2008/09. By 2016/17, the season-average
price is projected to reach $9.95 per cwt, the highest since 1996/97.
Prices are expected to drop slightly in 2007/08, primarily because
California production is expected to recover from 2 years of a below-normal
harvest. California rice—which is typically priced higher than
southern rice—has traded at near-historical high prices since
early 2006, a result of tight U.S. and global supplies of medium/short-grain
rice.
U.S. prices are projected to increase at a slower pace than global prices
from 2007/08 to 2013/14, reducing the price difference with major Asian
competitors. This difference decreases from $2.25 per cwt in 2006/07
to $1.25 in 2013/14, a major factor supporting the modest expansion in
U.S. exports over the next decade. The difference increases a few cents
from 2014/15 to 2016/17. The U.S. season-average farm price is projected
to be high enough throughout the period to make producers ineligible
for counter-cyclical payments.
Projections for World Rice Trade
International trade in rice is quite thin relative to total production.
In fact, only about 7 percent of global rice production is currently
traded each year, well below the trade shares for other grains and
oilseeds. Fifteen years ago, the trade share for rice was barely 4
percent. Increased market access has accounted for much of the expansion
in the trade share for rice. This has been especially true for much
of Latin America, where countries began to open their markets to imports
in the late 1980s. Despite greater market liberalization, many governments
worldwide—especially in Northeast Asia—continue to severely
limit rice imports and protect their producers. These policies limit
the volume of world rice trade.
In addition to being a relatively thin market, the global rice market
is heavily segmented, with little substitution among types and qualities
by producers or consumers. Long-grain typically accounts for more than
75 percent of global rice trade. Medium- and short-grain rice combined
account for about 12 percent of global trade. Fragrant or aromatic
rice accounts for about 12 percent. Specialty rices—primarily
glutinous rice—account for most of the remainder. Rice can also
be traded in various degrees of milling: fully milled (or polished)
rice, brown rice (sometimes referred to as cargo rice), or rough (paddy)
rice.
Global rice production and consumption are projected
to increase over the next decade. Global rice production
is projected to increase each year over the decade, almost
entirely due to rising yields. Average yields are projected
to increase slightly less than 1 percent a year, about the
same average growth rate that was achieved during the previous
10 years. Despite the annual increases, projected yield growth
is well below levels achieved from the late 1960s through the
1980s when modern high-yielding varieties were adopted in much
of Asia and Latin America.
Global rice area is projected to remain nearly flat over the
projection period, almost 2 percent below the 1999/2000 record.
Most Asian countries have little, if any, ability to expand rice
area. During the decade, smaller plantings in China are projected
to be nearly offset by expanded rice acreage in Sub-Saharan Africa
and Latin America. India, Sub-Saharan Africa, Bangladesh, the
Philippines, and Brazil account for most of the expected increase
in global rice production.
Global rice consumption is projected to increase over the next
10 years as well, largely due to a rising population in Asia
and a small increase in per capita rice disappearance in certain
non-Asian rice-consuming countries, mostly in the Western Hemisphere
and the Middle East. Many Asian countries—especially high-
and medium-income countries—are experiencing declining
per capita rice disappearance due to diet diversification resulting
from higher incomes. Even in many low-income Asian countries,
per capita rice disappearance is nearly flat.
Total rice consumption in China—the world's largest
rice-consuming country—is projected to decline over the
decade. In contrast, India, Indonesia, and Bangladesh—the
largest rice consuming countries after China—are expected
to consume larger quantities of rice each year. These three Asian
countries, plus Sub-Saharan Africa and the Philippines, account
for most of the expected increase in rice consumption over the
next 10 years.
On balance, consumption growth is projected to slightly outstrip
production increases, pulling ending stocks down about 7 percent
by 2016/17. Even with declining annual consumption, China accounts
for about half the projected contraction in global ending stocks.
The global stocks-to-use ratio is expected to fall from 18.7
percent in 2007/08 to 16.2 percent in 2016/17, the smallest since
1974/75.
Global rice trade is expected to increase each year. Global
rice trade is projected to increase 2.3 percent a year from 2007/08
until the end of the period, reaching a record 36.0 million metric
tons in 2016/17. Trade is expected to account for nearly 8 percent
of annual production by 2016/17, the highest share since before
World War II. Increased global rice trade is primarily driven
by rising import demand from Indonesia, the Philippines, Bangladesh,
the Middle East, and Sub-Saharan Africa. Combined, these five
markets account for about two-thirds of the increase in global
rice imports over the projection period.
Rising imports by Indonesia and Bangladesh are driven by growing
populations, little ability to expand rice area, and competition
for arable land from substitute crops and nonagricultural uses.
For Indonesia, land constraints and an already-high crop intensity—especially
on the island of Java—indicate little opportunity to significantly
expand production. Yields are projected to continue rising in
Bangladesh, as its high-yielding boro crop continues
to account for a larger share of total rice area. Even with expanded
area and higher yields, production growth is not expected to
keep pace with rising demand in the Philippines. Much of the
recent increase in Philippine rice production has been due to
the adoption of high-yielding hybrid varieties. In contrast to
Indonesia and Bangladesh, per capita disappearance is projected
to continue rising in the Philippines. Even with rising imports,
domestic production is still expected to account for the bulk
of the rice consumed in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Bangladesh.
Despite increasing production, Sub-Saharan Africa is expected
to import larger quantities of rice each year to meet rising
consumption, driven by a rapidly expanding population and rising
incomes. Imports account for slightly less than half of the rice
consumed in Sub-Saharan Africa. Strong consumption growth is
behind import expansion by the Middle East. Except for Iran and
Turkey, the Middle East grows very little rice and imports account
for almost two-thirds of its annual rice needs. Most of the Middle
East is a high-quality import market.
Among smaller import markets, Central America, the Caribbean,
Mexico, and the United States are all expected to increase rice
imports during the projections. Production can not keep pace
with consumption growth in Central America, the Caribbean, and
Mexico. Aromatic varieties account for nearly all expansion in
U.S. imports. However, imports are projected to rise only slightly
to Other Asia (including Oceania), a result of increasing production
and declining per capita consumption in much of Asia.
In contrast to these expanding markets, imports are projected
stagnant to slightly declining over the decade for Brazil as
per capita consumption declines—a result of rising incomes—and
production increases. Imports are projected nearly flat for South
Africa, a result of negligible growth in consumption. South Africa
does not produce rice.
Long-grain rice is expected to account for the bulk of the growth
in global rice trade from 2007/08-2016/17. Long-grain rice is imported
by a broad spectrum of countries in South and Southeast Asia, much
of the Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America. Medium/short-grain
rice is primarily imported by Northeast Asia—Japan, South
Korea, and Taiwan—and to a much lesser extent by several
countries in the eastern Mediterranean, with Turkey the largest.
Oceania imports a much smaller amount of medium/short-grain rice.
Expansion in the global medium/short-grain trade is projected to
be much slower than for long grain.
Asia and United States account
for the bulk of rice exports. Asia is expected to continue
to account for the bulk of rice exports over the projection period.
Six countries—Thailand, Vietnam, India, the United States,
Pakistan, and China—account for around 85 percent of rice
exports throughout the decade. Thailand and Vietnam, the world's
largest rice-exporting countries, account for nearly half of
all rice exports and more than 60 percent of the projected increase.
Rising production—nearly all due to higher yields—and
declining per capita consumption account for the expansion in
exports for both countries. Their combined share of global rice
trade increases slightly over the next 10 years.
India's exports increase more than 30 percent over the next
decade, with the country's share of global trade increasing
from almost 16 percent in 2007/08 to about 17 percent by 2016/17.
In India, high internal price supports continue to encourage large
production and exportable supplies. India is projected to remain
the fourth-largest exporter over the 10-year projection period.
In contrast to the top three exporters, export shares are projected
to decline for the United States, Pakistan, and China. The United
States is projected to be the fourth-largest rice exporting country
from 2007/08 to 2016/17. U.S. exports slowly increase over most
of the projection period, with an annual growth rate of about 1
percent after 2007/08. The U.S. share of global trade declines
from almost 12 percent in 2007/08, to about 10 percent by 2016/17.
Pakistan—currently, the fifth-largest rice exporting country—has
little ability to expand rice area. Producers are facing a growing
water shortage and agricultural-related environmental problems.
As a result, Pakistan's exports are projected to be relatively
flat—about 3 million metric tons a year—over the decade.
Rice exports from China—currently, the world's sixth-largest
exporter—remain almost flat at 1.0 million metric tons. China
exported an average of 2.6 million metric tons of rice a year from
1998 through 2003. The smaller export volume for China since 2004
has largely been due to tighter supplies.
Among the smaller exporting nations, Australia, Argentina, and
other South American countries (Uruguay, Guyana, and Surinam) are
expected to increase exports over the projection period. Australia
is projected to increase its rice exports from 150,000 metric tons
in 2007/08 to 220,000 metric tons by 2008/09, as production partially
recovers from severe drought. Despite this rebound, Australia's exports remain well below the record 662,000 metric tons shipped in 1998/99.
Argentina's rice exports are projected to expand 3-4 percent
a year during 2007/08-2016/17, as larger production more than offsets
growth in domestic consumption. Exports from other South American
countries (mostly Uruguay) are projected to increase at 2-3 percent
per year, as production growth outstrips domestic consumption.
Australia, Argentina, and Uruguay export most of their crop.
Egypt and the EU also export rice. Egypt's exports are projected
to decline over the next 10 years, as strong consumption growth
outstrips fractional increases in production. Egypt's exports
are currently at near-record levels. Rice plantings are not projected
to increase, and Egypt's yields are already the highest in
the world. Rice shipments from the EU are projected to be virtually
stagnant from 2008/09 to 2016/17, after slightly increasing in
early projections. The EU is not price-competitive in the global
market. Most EU rice exports are shipped to North Africa, the Middle
East, Central Asia, and Other Europe.
|