Cover of Amber Waves, April 2007 issue
Amber Waves: The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America

April 2007

| United States Department of Agriculture | Economic Research Service
Search   GO!  
Current Issue
All Issues
spacer Amber Waves Home
  Feature Articles

Findings

Statistics
  About Amber Waves
  E-mail notices
   

Farm Bill Resources

ERS Newsroom

 

USDA's Economic Research Service

Ad: Print Edition
Click here to subscribe to Amber Waves
Read more about our awards

 

 


Print this page Print | E-mail this link E-mail | Bookmark & Share Bookmark/share | Translate this page Translate | Text only Text only | resize text smallresize text mediumresize text large

Data Feature Heading

Meeting Fruit and Vegetable Dietary Recommendations Will Impact Agriculture

Photo: Farmers in apple orchard
The average American diet falls short of the daily recommendations for fruit and vegetables in the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans and in the supporting MyPyramid Food Guidance System. If Americans adopt diets that more closely follow the new guidelines, changes in the mix and quantity of foods produced in the U.S. would be substantial.

A recent ERS report provides estimates of the potential implications for U.S. agriculture if Americans change their consumption patterns to meet the 2005 recommendations. This straightforward extrapolation using ERS Food Guide Pyramid Servings data holds U.S. exports constant and holds the relative shares of production and imports constant at the average of 1999-2003 levels. U.S. farmers would grow more of the produce they grow now, and fruit and vegetable imports would increase.

If Americans were to fully meet the recommendations for fruit, they would need to increase daily fruit consumption by 132 percent. The additional demand would require U.S. producers to more than double annual harvested fruit acreage from 3.5 million to 7.6 million. As part of the dietary change, daily vegetable consumption would need to rise by about 31 percent, and the mix of vegetables consumed would need to change. For example, consumption of legumes, like kidney beans and lentils, would have to increase fourfold, and consumption of starchy vegetables would have to decline by a third. Accordingly, annual harvested acres of vegetables in the U.S. would need to increase by about 137 percent, from 6.5 million to 15.3 million, to meet this new demand. Most of this increase is due to higher acreage for legumes. Meanwhile, acreage for starchy vegetables would need to decrease.

These estimated acreage increases for both fruit and vegetables amount to almost 3 percent of total U.S. cropland in 2002. The additional acreage would likely come from current high-production areas or contiguous areas that have similar production characteristics, such as favorable climate and arable land.

Eating patterns change slowly in response to new dietary or medical information, changing tastes and preferences, and availability of new food products. Over time, Americans may make dietary changes that move them closer to the recommended intakes of fruit and vegetables, moving U.S. agriculture toward the production levels discussed here.

Servings of dark green and orange vegetables and legumes fall below 2005 recommendations

Food group

Dietary Guidelines
recommendations
for a 2,000-calorie diet

Servings
available in
2003 1/

Change needed
to meet
recommendations 2/

 

Cups per day

Percent

Fruit

2.0

.9

132

Vegetables

2.5

1.9

31

Dark green

.4

.2

175

Orange

.3

.1

183

Legumes

.4

.1

431

Starchy

.4

.7

-35

Other

.9

.9

2

1 Adjusted for losses from marketing and spoilage.
2 Computed from unrounded numbers.
Source: Prepared by USDA, Economic Research Service.

 

This finding is drawn from . . .

Possible Implications for U.S. Agriculture From Adoption of Select Dietary Guidelines, by Jean C. Buzby, Hodan Farah Wells, and Gary Vocke, ERR-31, USDA, Economic Research Service, November 2006.

You may also be interested in. . .

Food Availability (Per Capita) Data System.


printer iconPrinter-friendly format Download PDF version