|
NASS research reports offer a more technical look at the
survey itself. Topics covered include nonresponse, incentives,
and jackknife and calibration methods.
Categorizing
Nonresponse in Phase
III of the 2006 Agricultural Resource Management Survey in Washington
State
Michael
W. Gerling, HoaiNam N. Tran, Morgan S. Earp (Sept 2008) |
Nonresponse in Phase
III of the Agricultural Resource Management Survey in Louisiana
Michael
W. Gerling, HoaiNam N. Tran, Morgan S. Earp, Sammye Crawford (June 2008) |
Assessing
the Effect of Calibration on Nonresponse Bias in the 2006 ARMS Phase
III Sample Using Census 2002 Data
Morgan S. Earp, Jaki S. McCarthy, Nick D. Schauer, Phillip S. Kott (June
2008) |
Assessing
the Effect of Calibration on Nonresponse Bias in the 2005 ARMS Phase
III Sample Using 2002 Census of Agriculture Data
Morgan S. Earp, Jaki S. McCarthy, Nick D. Schauer, Phillip S. Kott (Jan
2008) |
Building a Better
Delete-a-Group Jackknife for a Calibration Estimator (Like That Based
on Data from the ARMS III) Extension
of paper presented at the Workshop on Calibration and Estimation in
Surveys, Ottawa, Ontario.
Phillip
S. Kott (Jan 2008) |
The Effect of
Incentives on Response in 2005 ARMS Phase III Interviews
Jaki S. McCarthy, Daniel G. Beckler, Kathleen Ott (Dec 2006) |
Indirect Monetary
Incentives for the 2004 ARMS Phase III Core
Daniel G.
Beckler, Kathleen Ott,
and Peter
Horvath (Nov 2005) |
Using Handheld Global
Positioning System Receivers for Phase II of the Agricultural Resource
Management Survey
Michael
W. Gerling (Oct 2005) |
Using
the Delete-A-Group Jackknife Variance Estimator in NASS Surveys
Phillip S. Kott (July 2001) |
|
