USDA Economic Research Service Briefing Room
" "  
Search ERS

 
Briefing Rooms

Print this page Print | E-mail this link E-mail | Bookmark & Share Bookmark/share | Translate this page Translate | Text only Text only | resize text smallresize text mediumresize text large

WTO: Recommended Readings

WTO's Three Pillars: Reduce Export Subsidies

Commitment: Developed countries committed to reduce subsidized exports by 21 percent in volume and 36 percent in value by the year 2000 (14 percent and 24 percent by the year 2004 for developing countries). New subsidies cannot be introduced. Bona fide food aid and export market promotion and advisory services are exempt. Use of marketing practices to circumvent export subsidy commitments is restricted.

  • The European Union accounts for most export subsidies—All countries spent over $27 billion on export subsidies during 1995-98. The EU accounts for over 89 percent of expenditures and the United States for just under 1.5 percent. The EU depends heavily on subsidies because it supports internal market prices above world prices.

Four countries account for 97 percent of all export subsidy expenditures

Source Data

  • Agenda 2000 reforms will reduce EU dependence on export subsidies—The EU recently enacted reforms to lower support prices for grains and beef, partly to meet its WTO commitments.
  • U.S. export subsidies are well below commitment levels—The United States has made minimal use of export subsidies for grains and poultry since the mid-1990's. The 1996 Farm Act required that dairy export subsidies be used at maximum permissible WTO levels.
  • Many value commitments have become more binding over the implementation period
  • Commitments are gradually becoming more binding—The percentage of volume and value commitments being filled has increased over the implementation period, as permitted subsidy levels declined and world prices fell.

The percentage of volume commitments filled has increased over time for many products

  • Many countries “roll over” unused subsidies—High world grain prices in 1995 and 1996 kept countries' export subsidies below their commitments. Some countries carried over unused portions of their commitments. Lower world grain prices may lead countries to apply unused portions against overruns in later years.

 

Dairy and meat products accounted for the largest expenditures on export subsidies

Source Data

More remains to be done: Use of export subsidies declined from pre-Uruguay Round levels. However, some countries could increase use of subsidies from current levels. Further progress in trade liberalization depends on continued reductions or elimination of export subsidies.

Data source: WTO export subsidy notifications.

Return to Three pillars, Increase Market Access, Reduce Export Subsidies, or Reduce Domestic Support

Top of page

 

For more information, contact: Mary Anne Normile

Web administration: webadmin@ers.usda.gov

Updated date: December 28, 2000