Robert Gibbs
Rural Development Research Report Number 98,
January 2004
Rural Americans today have attained historically high
levels of education. In 2000, nearly one in six rural
adults had a 4-year college degree, about twice the share
of a generation ago. (Over 40 percent have completed at
least 1 year of college.) However, rura education still
lags urban levels, and large regional and racial differences
persist. The South, for instance, with a third of the
Nation’s rural population, is home to half of all
rural adults who have not completed high school. Rural
Hispanics and Blacks are half as likely as non-Hispanic
Whites to complete college and at least twice as likely
to lack a high school diploma.
The skill requirements of rural jobs continue to rise
along with education levels. Although less educated rural
adults fared well in the 1990s due to the robust economic
expansion, their prospects are uncertain. Many rural jobs
historically held by workers with limited education have
been lost to changes in production technology, overseas
competition, and changing consumer demand. Prospective
employers are increasingly attracted to areas offering
a concentration of well-educated and skilled workers,
just as better educated youth and adults are still drawn
to places— often in cities—that offer better
jobs with higher salaries. Although investments in education
are not a panacea for places struggling to attract jobs
and residents, they can be an important part of a broader
economic development strategy.
USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) analyzes
the ongoing changes in rural areas and assesses Federal,
State, and local strategies to enhance economic opportunity
and quality of life for rural Americans. This publication
provides the latest information on the education-related
characteristics of rural workers (age 25 and older) and
counties.
Rural Educational Attainment Continues
To Rise
Rural Americans have more years of schooling than
ever before. The rise in attainment continues a long upward
trend, reflecting both universal access to comprehensive
public education and a transition from a resource-based
economy to one dominated by service employment.
- In 2000, 15.5 percent of nonmetro adults age 25 and
older—about one in six—had graduated from
a 4-year college, more than double the 1970 rate.
- The share of nonmetro adults without a high school
diploma or GED equivalent fell to a historic low of
23.2 percent in 2000.
Urban and nonmetro residents differ in educational characteristics
- The largest gap between metro and nonmetro educational
attainment was in college completion—the metro
share of 26.6 percent was 11 percentage points higher
than the nonmetro share.
- The rural-urban college completion gap is caused
largely by lower attendance rates among rural high school
graduates compared with urban graduates. The gap is
reinforced by the smaller rural share of managerial,
professional, and technical jobs that typically require
post-secondary degrees. Lower rural demand for highly
educated workers encourages both rural and urban youth
who complete college to make their homes in urban areas.
The urban-rural gap in educational attainment does not
necessarily reflect student achievement
- On average, rural students perform about as well
as urban students—with scores slightly above those
of central city students and slightly below those of
suburban students—on national standardized tests.
- Specialized and advanced course offerings in rural
schools are more limited, on average, than in urban
schools due to the shortage of appropriately trained
teachers and financial constraints. But rural schools
often experience closer ties among teachers, parents,
and students, fostering a supportive academic environment.
Educational attainment varies sharply by race and ethnicity
- Nonmetro non-Hispanic Whites were at least twice
as likely to have a college degree as American Indian,
Black, or Hispanic adults.
- Nonmetro Hispanics have the lowest educational attainment—
about half had not finished high school in 2000 and
only 6.5 percent had completed 4 years of college.
- Metro Blacks were over twice as likely to hold a
college degree as nonmetro Blacks—the largest
attainment difference among races. Still, education
levels among nonmetro Blacks have risen sharply in recent
decades. Their high school completion rate rose 12 percentage
points between 1990 and 2000.
Educational attainment among younger adults is often
viewed as a harbinger of future trends
- Nonmetro adults under 55 have significantly higher
levels of education than older
nonmetro adults, particularly with regard to high school
completion.
- But high school and college completion rates are
similar across the 25-55 age range, suggesting that
the sharpest upswing in educational attainment occurred
in the 1960s and moderated in subsequent decades.
Education Increasingly Rewarded
in Rural Labor Markets
The labor market rewards to a college degree have
greatly increased in the past 20 years. Rural college
graduates now make more than twice as much as rural high
school dropouts and have far lower unemployment rates.
College graduates, however, still earn much more in cities,
making it harder for rural counties to build their human
capital base.
- Unemployment rates rose for nonmetro workers age
25 and over, regardless of
educational attainment, between 2001 and 2002, due in
part to the effects of the 2001 economic recession.
But nonmetro unemployment rates in 2002 remained much
higher for those without a high school diploma (8.4
percent) than for college graduates (1.9 percent). Unemployment
rates for nonmetro high school graduates and for college
attendees without a 4-year degree were at 5 and 3.8
percent, respectively.
- Average weekly earnings for nonmetro college graduates
were $782 in 2002, compared with $355 for nonmetro workers
who had not completed high school. High school graduates
and those with some college experience, but not a degree,
earned $438 and $502.
- Earnings for metro college graduates were 12 percent
higher than those for nonmetro college graduates in
2002. The earnings gap between metro and nonmetro workers
without a high school diploma was just 4 percent.
- Nonmetro adults with at least a 4-year college degree
also experience a very low incidence of poverty. They
are about a third as likely to be poor (3.5 percent)
as nonmetro adults overall. (11 percent). They are one
seventh as likely to be poor as those without a high
school diploma (23.5 percent).
Low Education Levels Challenge Much
of Rural America
Just as urban and rural education levels differ,
there is also great variation within rural America. Low
education levels pose a challenge for many rural counties
seeking economic development. Raising education levels—and
the quality of that education—is essential to improving
the economic life of rural communities and the well-being
of the rural population. The outmigration of rural youth
to places with better job opportunities limits the effects
of schooling investments on local communities. Still,
better schools and outmigration often work together to
expand rural youths’ economic horizons.
- Rural high school completion rates vary widely across
regions. The bottom quarter ofnonmetro counties (ranked
by completion rates) averaged a 65-percent rate, compared
with 87 percent for the top quarter. Two thirds of the
bottom-quarter counties are in the South, including
many central Appalachian counties and those with large
minority populations.
- High school completion rates are high along the coastal
Northeast, in the western Great Lakes region, the central
Great Plains, much of the northern and central portions
of the Rocky Mountains, and parts of the Pacific Northwest.
- College completion corresponds closely to the degree
of urbanization. High concentrations of college-educated
adults can be found in and around the large and medium-size
cities of every region. Nonmetro counties with a large
share of college graduates are typically sites of large
colleges and universities, or other large research facilities.
High completion rates are also common throughout much
of the Mountain West, the Great Plains, the northwestern
Great Lakes region, and upper New England.
-
Low education is highly correlated with persistent poverty.
The quarter of nonmetro counties with the lowest high
school completion rates include two-thirds of all persistent
poverty counties. A third of adults in persistently
poor counties, on average, lack a high school diploma.
Low education levels are associated with a low-wage
economy and a less stable labor force. In addition,
poor counties lack the tax base and often the social
and community capital to invest adequately in better
schools, which reinforces long-term economic distress.
- The educational credentials of the workforce increasingly
affect local job growth. In 2000, manufacturing still
accounted for over a fourth of all nonmetro private
sector earnings, anchoring many local economies. As
late as the 1980s, manufacturing sought areas of low
education, which tend to have lower wages. Yet globalization
and new technologies in the 1990s favored areas with
higher education levels.
Definitions
and sources |
More About Education at ERS
For more information, go to the ERS Web site’s
briefing
room on labor and education in rural America.
For general information about rural America,visit
the Rural
Emphasis page.
As important as the education levels of the present
rural workforce are, the schooling of the next generation
is equally vital. More research is needed on quality-related
characteristics of rural schools and their relationship
to student achievement and community well-being.
USDA has played a key role in advancing the quality
of instruction in rural schools through its distance
education technology grants, and through a wide
range of programs focused on enriching elementary
and secondary education curricula, such as the longstanding
4-H youth program. ERS has also begun collaborative
efforts with other academic and policy institutions
in a number of areas related to rural schools.
Conference on rural education and economic
development
In April 2003, ERS, the Southern Rural Development
Center, and the Rural School and Community Trust
sponsored a national workshop on the links between
rural schools and local community and economic development.
Participants from a wide range of professional disciplines
and affiliations met to present and discuss topics
such as the implications of school consolidation
on educational outcomes, the effect of school quality
and education levels on local population and income
growth, and the economic benefits to a community
of having a local school. Findings will be disseminated
through online working papers and in scholarly journals.
Priority research program on school quality
and local economic growth
The critical role of education in local, regional,
and national economic development has become a central
public policy issue in recent years. Rural communities
view increased educational investments as an important
part of economic development, but are sensitive
to the partial loss of their investment, in the
form of youth outmigration to areas with better
education and job opportunities. ERS is partnering
with land-grant universities in a research program
designed to measure the relationship between education
and economic outcomes, both for the individual worker
and rural community, in order to help local communities
better target their economic development and school
improvement efforts.
Assessing the rural education and training
system
In the late 1990s, ERS and collaborating researchers
conducted a large-scale project to evaluate the
quality of rural America’s schools and the
knowledge and skills of the rural workforce using
newly emerging Federal data sources. Rural Education
and Training in the New Economy: The Myth of the
Rural Skills Gap (Iowa State University Press, 1998)
remains the most comprehensive quantitative analysis
of rural education available. The project’s
main conclusion is that, although rural schools
may not always match the instructional quality and
access to resources found in suburban areas, rural
schools and students generally perform well on a
variety of achievement measures.
What Is Rural?
The statistics reported in this publication are
based on the metropolitan and nonmetropolitan definitions
announced by the Office of Management and Budget
in 1993. Metropolitan areas contain (1) core counties
with one or more central cities of at least 50,000
residents or with a Census Bureau-defined urbanized
area (and a total metro area population of 100,000
or more), and (2) fringe counties that are economically
tied to the core counties. Nonmetropolitan counties
are outside the boundaries of metro areas and have
no cities with as many as 50,000 residents. The
data reported are for nonmetro and metro areas,
but here we use the terms “rural” and
“urban” interchangeably with “nonmetro”
and “metro.” Although metropolitan and
nonmetropolitan definitions based on the 2000 Census
were released in 2003 some sources report data by
the previous definitions only.
Data Sources
This report draws upon the research of the Food
and Rural Economics Division of ERS. Data used in
this analysis come primarily from the 1990 and 2000
Censuses of Population, the 2000 Current Population
Survey outgoing rotation files, and the Regional
Economic Information System of the Bureau of Economic
Analysis.
|
|