According to recent Census of Agriculture data, the number
of large farms and very small farms has increased, while
the number of small to midsized farms has declined. The
changing size distribution of farms makes it difficult
to capture trends in the concentration of production using
common measures, such as the average or median farm size.
This data product provides a size measure (the acre-weighted
median for cropland and for farmland) that reflects the
increasing concentration of production on large farms.
The acre-weighted median, here provided at the county level,
is calculated by ordering farms from smallest to largest
and picking the farm size at the middle acre (the standard
median focuses on the middle farm). Half of all land is
on farms smaller than the acre-weighted median, and half
of land is on bigger farms. A county's acre-weighted median
better reflects the size of operations where most production
occurs.
Comparing different measures of farm size, 1982,
1987, 1992, 1997, and 2002 |
|
1982 |
1987 |
1992 |
1997 |
2002 |
|
Farmland (acres) |
Average farm size |
431 |
452 |
480 |
477 |
441 |
Median farm size |
122 |
125 |
125 |
120 |
95 |
Acre-weighted median |
1,620 |
1,700 |
1,925 |
2,000 |
2,190 |
Source: USDA, Economic Research Service
tabulations based on Census of Agriculture data from
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service. |
Here we document two measures of concentration, constructed
for each county from individual records for each of five
Censuses of Agriculture: 1982, 1987, 1992, 1997, and 2002.
For each county and year, farmland concentration is
defined as the acre-weighted median of total land in farms.
Intuitively, this measure is the farm size (in acres)
for which half the farmland area in the county occurs
on larger farms and half occurs on smaller farms. The
measure is constructed by ordering farms from smallest
to largest, finding the cumulative sum of acres along this
ordering, and selecting the farm size at the point where
the cumulative sum equals half the total number of farmland
acres in the county. Observations are not included for
counties where half or more of the total land in farms
occurs on a single farm, or if the Census of Agriculture
did not disclose total land in farms for other reasons.
Cropland concentration is defined analogously
to farmland concentration, except that only
cropland acres are considered (farmland also includes pasture,
range, woodland, etc.). The measure of cropland used
here equals cropland acres harvested plus cropland on which
all crops failed. Thus, cropland concentration is
the size (measured in acres) for which half the
county's cropland occurs on farms with more cropland acres
and half occurs on farms with less cropland. Observations
are not included for counties where half or more of the
cropland occurs on a single farm, or if the Census of
Agriculture did not disclose total cropland harvested for
other reasons.
Nonresponse Weights and Changes in 2002
For each census year and county, nonresponse
weights are used to adjust Census statistics for farms
that did not return a census form. Beginning in 2002,
the sample frame and non-response weights used in the Census
of Agriculture changed significantly.
This change increased the total farm count as reported
by the Census of Agriculture. To a lesser degree, the
change also influences our measures of concentration. The
data on concentration measures for 2002 are provided two
ways, using the old (pre-2002) and new (2002) nonresponse
weights. When making comparisons with earlier years, it
is better to use the pre-2002 weighted measures.
For more information about ERS research using these
measures of concentration in research, see the Amber
Waves data
feature,
Measures
of Trends in Farm Size Tell Differing Stories,
and the article, Cropland
Concentrating Faster Where Payments
Are Higher.
|